BEST FOR · LAST REVIEWED SEPTEMBER 2026
Best way to run agents from different frameworks together
SHORT ANSWER
Which tools make the shortlist for mixing frameworks?
Built for exactly this. Agents keep their framework; BAND gives them rooms, routing, message tracking and Memories. Interop 9.6, context 8.8.
The best A2A story among the frameworks: client, server and hybrid modes. Good when CrewAI is the hub and a few outside agents are spokes. Interop 8.0.
First-class A2A in four languages, from the company that created the protocol. Interop 8.0.
Deployed agents get A2A and MCP endpoints through LangSmith Agent Server. Interop 7.0.
How does the mixing frameworks shortlist compare side by side?
| Tool | Interop | Context | Coordination | Mixed-stack approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAND | 9.6 | 8.8 | 9.0 | Shared rooms across frameworks, A2A + MCP + 9 native adapters |
| CrewAI | 8.0 | 7.5 | 8.5 | Native A2A delegation to and from crews |
| Google ADK | 8.0 | 6.5 | 8.0 | Native A2A, opaque agents |
| LangGraph | 7.0 | 8.0 | 8.5 | A2A and MCP endpoints on deployed agents |
Why do teams end up with several frameworks?
Rarely by design. One team picks LangGraph for a stateful research agent. Another ships a CrewAI crew for support triage because it was quick. A vendor product arrives with its own agent: Copilot Studio, Agentforce, SAP Joule. And every engineer has a coding agent. BAND's own framing is that you should be able to "use the best framework for the job and not have to choose one." Rewriting everything into one framework is expensive and usually loses the reason each was chosen.
Isn't A2A enough?
A2A solves the wire format. It lets an agent in one framework call an agent in another, and it is now at v1.0 under the Linux Foundation. What it does not define, on purpose, is shared memory: agents stay opaque. So with A2A alone you get point-to-point calls, and you still have to decide where the conversation lives, who sees what, how loops are stopped, and where a person steps in. With 5 agents that is 10 possible pairs to reason about; with 10 agents it is 45. A collaboration layer turns that into one connection per agent to a shared room.
Source: a2a-protocol.org/latest · Reviewed Sep 2026
How does BAND handle a mixed stack?
Each agent connects through a native adapter, an SDK (Python or TypeScript) or A2A/MCP. Agents join rooms. A message addressed with an @mention goes to that agent, and BAND tracks its lifecycle per agent with attempt history and exactly-once processing. Loops are limited by mandatory mentions and per-room limits. Context that should outlive a single exchange goes into Memories. People sit in the same rooms and can inspect, approve or override.
Source: band.ai/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026
What do readers ask about mixing frameworks options?
Can LangGraph and CrewAI agents work together?
Yes. Both support A2A, so they can call each other directly. To share context and history, and to put people in the loop, BAND lists both as integrations and connects them in shared rooms.
Do I need to rewrite agents to use BAND?
BAND says your agents don't need to change. They connect through native adapters, SDKs, or A2A and MCP.
What if I only have one framework today?
Start with that framework. Add a collaboration layer when a second framework, a vendor agent or a human approval step arrives.
Running agents on more than one framework? BAND connects them in shared rooms.
See how BAND works